The COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool is an Excel-based utility primarily provided by ISACA to help organizations evaluate the capability and maturity of their Information and Technology (I&T) governance system. Unlike its predecessor (COBIT 5), COBIT 2019 shifts from the ISO/IEC 33000 standard to a performance management scheme based on CMMI. Core Verified Tools and Resources

COBIT 2019 Governance System Design Tool Kit: This is the primary official Excel tool available at ISACA. It helps users execute the four design steps of COBIT 2019 and quantify the influence of various Design Factors on their governance objectives.

RACI Matrix: A recent enhancement to the official tool kit, this Excel-based matrix helps practitioners identify critical roles and responsibilities (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) for a well-designed governance system.

Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Scheme: COBIT 2019 uses CMMI to measure capability levels from 0 to 5: Level 0 (Incomplete): Non-existent or incomplete processes.

Level 1 (Initial/Performed): Ad-hoc implementation that achieves the process's purpose.

Level 2 (Managed): Processes are planned, monitored, and adjusted.

Level 3 (Defined): Processes are standardized across the organization.

Level 4 (Quantitative): Processes are measured and controlled.

Level 5 (Optimizing): Focus on continuous process improvement. Key Features of Assessment Tool Templates Building a Maturity Model for COBIT 2019 Based on CMMI

The most reliable and "verified" tool for a COBIT 2019 assessment is the official COBIT 2019 Design Guide Tool Kit, an Excel-based tool provided by ISACA. While COBIT 2019 moved away from the older Process Assessment Model (PAM) toward a CMMI-based Performance Management model, this official toolkit remains the standard for designing and initially assessing governance systems. Official COBIT 2019 Assessment Tools

COBIT 2019 Design Guide Tool Kit (XLS): This is the primary Excel tool designed to help practitioners walk through the COBIT design factors and determine target capability levels.

How to Access: Visit the ISACA COBIT resources page, scroll to "More Implementation Resources," and select the Access the COBIT Tool Kit button.

CMMI-Based Performance Management (CPM): COBIT 2019 integrates CMMI concepts where capability levels (0–5) are assigned to activities within each of the 40 governance and management objectives. Verified Third-Party & Community Templates

If you are looking for more granular process-level assessment worksheets, several verified professional templates are available:

Domain-Specific Assessment Templates: Specialized Excel templates for domains like EDM (Evaluate, Direct, and Monitor) or APO (Align, Plan, and Organize) are often used by auditors to track individual process capability scores.

ITSM Docs Maturity Templates: Organizations often use standardized COBIT Maturity Assessment Templates from sites like ITSM Docs for a structured approach to identifying gaps and developing improvement roadmaps.

COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Gaps: Community-contributed XLSX files on platforms like Scribd can provide dynamic gap analysis formulas, though these should be cross-referenced with official ISACA guidelines. Summary of Assessment Levels Description Capability Level Applied to individual processes (0–5 scale). Maturity Level

Applied to focus areas (e.g., Cyber Security, DevOps) based on the aggregate capability of related objectives. COBIT Maturity Assessment Template - ITSM Docs

COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool is primarily available as part of the official ISACA COBIT 2019 Design Toolkit

. Unlike previous versions that used a separate maturity model, COBIT 2019 integrates maturity and capability assessments directly into its COBIT Performance Management (CPM) framework, which is aligned with CMMI V2.0. 1. Where to Find the "Verified" XLS Tool

Official assessment tools for COBIT 2019 are proprietary and should be sourced directly from to ensure they are "verified" and up-to-date. ISACA COBIT 2019 Tool Kit

: An Excel-based tool for designing a governance system and setting target capability levels. Process Assessment Templates

: Some educational and community sources provide specialized domain-specific XLSX templates for EDM, APO, BAI, and DSS domains to facilitate auditing. Community Resources : Platforms like Academia.edu

host "Dynamic" or "Canvas" workbooks that practitioners use for gap analysis. 2. COBIT 2019 Assessment Scale

Measuring IT Maturity with COBIT® 2019 Framework - Multimatics

The COBIT 2019 Design Toolkit is the official Excel-based tool provided by ISACA to help organizations design a tailored governance system and assess maturity levels. Official & Verified Resources

COBIT 2019 Design Guide Tool Kit (Excel): This verified spreadsheet facilitates the governance system design workflow. It includes tabs for evaluating 11 design factors that influence your target maturity and capability levels. You can access it via the ISACA COBIT Resources page under "More Implementation Resources".

Performance Management Scheme: Unlike COBIT 5, the 2019 version uses a CMMI-based performance management scheme (CPM) with a scale from 0 to 5 (Incomplete to Optimizing) to measure the capability of 40 governance and management objectives. Key Articles on Maturity Assessment

Effective Capability and Maturity Assessment Using COBIT 2019: This ISACA Industry News article explains how stakeholder needs and enterprise objectives are evaluated to set direction and monitor compliance.

Building a Maturity Model for COBIT 2019 Based on CMMI: Since there is no longer a standalone "Process Assessment Model" (PAM) like in COBIT 5, this ISACA Journal article provides a roadmap for using CMMI levels to measure organizational maturity.

Defining Target Capability Levels in COBIT 2019: This article proposes a refinement procedure for defining process target capability levels more robustly by assigning ratings (N, P, L, or F) to specific activities. Third-Party Assessment Templates (Unverified)

While not "official," various academic and practitioner tools have been developed for specific domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA) and are often shared on educational platforms like IT-Slideshare for research purposes.

Effective Capability and Maturity Assessment Using COBIT 2019

Securing a high-performing IT governance framework is no longer optional for modern enterprises. For those looking to implement or refine their governance, the COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool is a pivotal resource. Often distributed in a verified XLS format, this tool simplifies the complex process of measuring how well your IT processes align with business goals. What is the COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool?

COBIT 2019, developed by ISACA, is the industry standard for the governance and management of enterprise information and technology (EGIT). The maturity assessment tool—specifically the verified Excel version—is a structured toolkit that allows organizations to:

Evaluate current capabilities: Measure the performance of 40 core governance and management objectives.

Identify gaps: Pinpoint where current IT practices fall short of desired performance levels.

Roadmap for improvement: Create a prioritized action plan to reach higher maturity levels. Key Components of the XLS Tool

The official COBIT 2019 Design Guide Toolkit provides several automated Excel-based features to streamline assessments: Functionality Design Factor Input

Enter data regarding your enterprise strategy, risk profile, and role of IT to automatically prioritize objectives. CPM Scoring

Uses the COBIT Performance Management (CPM) model, scoring processes on a scale of 0 to 5. RACI Matrix

Helps identify who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each process. Target Setting

Allows you to set "Target Capability Levels" based on your specific organizational needs. The Maturity Levels Explained

COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool is a critical resource for organizations seeking to evaluate their IT governance and management capabilities. Unlike its predecessor, COBIT 5, which used the Process Assessment Model (PAM), COBIT 2019 adopts a performance management model aligned with CMMI® Development V2.0

. This shift allows for a more flexible, data-driven approach to measuring how well IT processes support business goals. The Role of the Excel-Based Assessment Tool ISACA provides an official COBIT 2019 Design Guide Tool Kit

in Excel format. This "verified" tool facilitates several key assessment functions: Building a Maturity Model for COBIT 2019 Based on CMMI 28 Dec 2021 —

The primary verified tool for assessing maturity in COBIT 2019 is the COBIT 2019 Design Guide Tool Kit

, which is a comprehensive Excel-based resource provided directly by

Unlike COBIT 5, which used a Process Assessment Model (PAM) based on ISO/IEC 15504, COBIT 2019 utilizes a Performance Management (CPM) model based on the CMMI Performance Management Scheme . Maturity is measured on a scale from 0 to 5. Verified Tools & Resources ISACA COBIT 2019 Tool Kit

: The official spreadsheet tool available to ISACA members (and often as a free download for some tiers). It includes RACI matrices

and a design workbook to calculate target capability levels based on enterprise-specific design factors. COBIT 2019 Governance System Design Workbook

: A specific "Canvas" tab within the official toolkit used to refine the scope and determine suggested maturity levels. Process Assessment Templates

: Educational and research-oriented templates are often shared by academic and industry sites like IT-Slideshare for specific domains like EDM, APO, and BAI. Industry News 2020 COBIT Tool Kit Enhancements - ISACA

I couldn’t find a specific, verified third-party review for a product named exactly “COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool xls verified” — it’s likely a custom or commercially licensed spreadsheet, possibly from a consulting firm or an individual on a marketplace like Excel or Gumroad. “Verified” in the name may refer to the seller’s claim (e.g., alignment with ISACA’s COBIT 2019 definitions) rather than an independent certification.

However, based on similar COBIT 2019 Excel-based maturity tools, here’s a general review of what you can expect:

Pros (if well-made):

• Structured approach – Typically maps COBIT 2019 core components (governance objectives, management objectives, capability levels) into rating scales (0–5 or 0–4).
• Automated scoring – Sums or averages responses per process, often generating radar/spider charts for maturity gaps.
• Customizable – Easier to tweak criteria, add objectives, or adjust weightings compared to commercial software.
• Low cost – Often much cheaper than dedicated GRC tools (like MetricStream, RSA Archer, or ISACA’s own solutions).
• Offline access – Works without licensing servers or annual subscriptions.

Cons / risks:

• No true “verification” – Be skeptical of “verified” unless it includes an audit trail or certification from ISACA or a known partner. Most are self-declared.
• Static & manual – You still need to input evidence; no automation for data gathering. Maturity scores can be subjective without clear guidelines.
• COBIT 2019 complexity – The framework uses capability levels (not “maturity” in the old CMM sense). Many Excel tools incorrectly apply pre-2019 definitions.
• Lack of reporting depth – No built-in heatmaps, trend analysis over time, or linkage to risk/control libraries.
• Support – If bought from a small vendor, you may get no updates when COBIT guidance evolves.

What to check before buying:

• Does the tool use capability levels 0–5 (per ISO 15504) and align with COBIT 2019 design factors?
• Is the “verified” claim backed by a sample report or independent user testimonials?
• Does it include a user guide or evidence collection sheets?
• Can you see a screenshot of the formulas (to ensure no hidden errors in calculations)?

Alternatives:

• ISACA’s own COBIT 2019 Assessment Kit (more reliable but not free)
• Open-source templates from groups like IT Process Maps (less polished but free)
• Lightweight GRC tools with COBIT 2019 content (e.g., ZenGRC, StandardFusion)

Final verdict:
If the price is low (<$50) and you need a quick, internal benchmark, such an XLS tool can be useful — just don’t rely on “verified” as absolute accuracy. For an external audit or formal compliance, invest in ISACA’s official materials or a proper GRC tool. If possible, ask the seller for a demo or a reference from a past buyer before purchasing.

Conducting a COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment: A Step-by-Step Guide

The COBIT 2019 maturity assessment tool is a widely used framework for evaluating an organization's IT governance and management capabilities. The tool provides a comprehensive assessment of an organization's current maturity level, helping identify areas for improvement and providing a roadmap for achieving desired levels of maturity.

What is COBIT 2019?

COBIT 2019 is a framework created by ISACA for IT governance and management. It provides a set of guidelines, processes, and practices to help organizations align their IT strategies with their business objectives. COBIT 2019 is designed to be flexible and adaptable to various organizational structures, sizes, and industries.

COBIT 2019 Maturity Model

The COBIT 2019 maturity model consists of five maturity levels, each representing a level of capability and performance:

1. Level 0 - Incomplete: No processes are implemented, or they are not effective.
2. Level 1 - Initial: Processes are ad hoc and not well-defined.
3. Level 2 - Managed: Processes are defined, but not consistently implemented.
4. Level 3 - Established: Processes are consistently implemented and managed.
5. Level 4 -Predictable: Processes are optimized and operate within defined control limits.
6. Level 5 - Optimizing: Processes are continually improved and optimized.

Conducting a COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment

To conduct a COBIT 2019 maturity assessment, follow these steps:

1. Identify the scope: Define the scope of the assessment, including the processes, domains, and business units to be evaluated.
2. Gather data: Collect data through surveys, interviews, and document reviews.
3. Assess current maturity: Use the COBIT 2019 maturity assessment tool to evaluate the current maturity level of each process.
4. Identify gaps: Identify gaps between the current and desired maturity levels.
5. Develop a roadmap: Create a roadmap to address the gaps and achieve the desired maturity level.

Using the COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool (XLS Verified)

The COBIT 2019 maturity assessment tool (XLS verified) is an Excel-based tool that provides a structured approach to assessing maturity. The tool includes:

1. Process assessment: Evaluate the maturity of each process using a set of predefined questions.
2. Maturity level calculation: Calculate the maturity level of each process based on the assessment results.
3. Gap analysis: Identify gaps between the current and desired maturity levels.
4. Roadmap development: Create a roadmap to address the gaps and achieve the desired maturity level.

By using the COBIT 2019 maturity assessment tool (XLS verified), organizations can:

• Evaluate their current IT governance and management capabilities
• Identify areas for improvement
• Develop a roadmap to achieve desired levels of maturity
• Continuously monitor and improve their IT governance and management practices

Conclusion

The COBIT 2019 maturity assessment tool is a valuable resource for organizations seeking to evaluate and improve their IT governance and management capabilities. By following the steps outlined in this guide and using the COBIT 2019 maturity assessment tool (XLS verified), organizations can gain a comprehensive understanding of their current maturity level and develop a roadmap to achieve desired levels of maturity.

4. Evidence Log Tab

• Links each score to specific artifacts (policies, meeting minutes, audit reports).
• Crucial for “verified” status – shows traceability.

Strengths

• Alignment: Closely follows COBIT 2019 terminology and process structure, enabling consistent assessments.
• Usability: Familiar Excel interface; can be customized without special tools.
• Traceability: Allows linking ratings to evidence and assessor comments, which supports auditability.
• Visuals: Built-in charts and heatmaps aid stakeholder communication.
• Cost-effectiveness: Low-cost alternative to specialized assessment software.
• Offline capability: No internet dependency, suitable for secure environments.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Using an XLS Tool

Even a verified tool can be misused. Avoid these mistakes:

| Pitfall | Solution | |--------|----------| | Assessing without evidence | Enforce the Evidence Log tab before allowing scores above 2. | | Using outdated COBIT 2019 objectives | Verify that the tool includes the latest “Information” enabler and updated process IDs. | | Over-reliance on self-assessment | Include a peer-review column to calibrate over-optimistic scoring. | | Treating maturity as a one-time project | Schedule quarterly mini-assessments using the Trend tab. | | Ignoring the “managed” vs “performed” nuance | Train staff on ISO 15504 level definitions before scoring. |

What to Look for in a "Verified" Tool

When searching for an "XLS verified" assessment tool, you aren't just looking for a spreadsheet; you are looking for specific criteria that ensure compliance with ISACA standards:

1. Correct Attribute Mapping: Does the tool correctly map the process attributes (PA 1.1 through PA 3.2) to the specific COBIT 2019 governance and management objectives?
2. Scoring Logic: A verified tool must correctly apply the ISACA scoring rules (0-15%, 16-50%, 51-85%, 86-100%) for each attribute.
3. Focus Areas: Does it allow you to toggle between the Core Model and specific Design & Performance focus areas?
4. Output Visualization: Can it generate a heat map or capability radar chart automatically?

★★★★☆ (4.2/5)

A useful, structured template – but “verified” requires clarification

Practical recommendations for use

• Prepare an assessment plan: define scope, stakeholders, evidence sources, and assessors.
• Pilot on a small set of processes to validate the spreadsheet’s logic and your scoring approach.
• Standardize scoring: provide assessors with a short rubric and examples to reduce subjectivity.
• Use version control: store files on a controlled repository (SharePoint, secure file server) and keep an explicit change log.
• Consider augmenting with a lightweight database or SharePoint list for multi-user scenarios and historical trend analysis.
• If you need workflow, role-based access, or enterprise-scale reporting, evaluate commercial GRC/assessment tools.