Skip to content
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.
  1. Webgility Help Center
  2. david irving - hitler----s war-la guerra de hitler -castellano-.pdf
  3. david irving - hitler----s war-la guerra de hitler -castellano-.pdf

David Irving - Hitler----s War-la Guerra De Hitler -castellano-.pdf [extra Quality] May 2026

La Guerra de Hitler (originalmente Hitler’s War), escrita por el polémico autor británico David Irving, es una de las obras más controvertidas de la historiografía de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Publicada originalmente en inglés en 1977 y traducida al castellano en 1980 por la editorial Planeta, la obra pretende narrar el conflicto estrictamente desde la perspectiva de Adolf Hitler, utilizando documentos primarios y diarios de su círculo íntimo. Contexto y Perspectiva de la Obra

El objetivo declarado de Irving en este libro de casi 1,000 páginas era "limpiar la suciedad" de la figura de Hitler para presentarlo como un líder racional. El autor se jactaba de basar su investigación en fuentes directas, como los diarios de los generales y ministros del Reich, en lugar de apoyarse en trabajos académicos previos.

Punto de Vista Interno: La narrativa se sitúa "detrás del escritorio de Hitler", intentando explicar sus decisiones militares y políticas desde su propia óptica.

Revisionismo Inicial: Irving sostiene que la invasión de la Unión Soviética fue una "guerra preventiva" necesaria para evitar un ataque inminente de Stalin.

La Tesis de la Exoneración: Quizás el punto más polémico es la afirmación de Irving de que no existe evidencia documental que pruebe que Hitler ordenó o conocía el exterminio sistemático de los judíos hasta finales de 1943, atribuyendo la responsabilidad a subordinados como Himmler o Goebbels. Controversia Legal y Académica Hitler's War: Amazon.co.uk: David Irving: 9798991972475

David Irving's "Hitler's War" (Spanish title: "La Guerra de Hitler") remains one of the most controversial works of 20th-century historiography. Originally published in 1977, the book attempted a unique narrative technique: describing World War II strictly through the eyes of Adolf Hitler. While it gained initial praise for its use of primary documents and diaries previously ignored by other historians, it eventually led to the total destruction of Irving’s academic reputation. Overview of "La Guerra de Hitler"

The book's central premise was to "clean away the years of grime" from Hitler's monument. Irving focused on several key themes:

The "Insider" Perspective: The narrative unfolds in the exact sequence Hitler experienced events. For example, the reader only learns of the July 20 plot when the bomb actually explodes under Hitler's table.

Military Focus: It details Hitler’s strategies, foreign policy gambits, and his frequent conflicts with his own generals.

The "Preventive War" Theory: Irving argued that the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 was a necessary strike to prevent a Soviet attack on Germany.

Hitler's Responsibility: Most controversially, Irving claimed that Hitler was unaware of the Holocaust or actively tried to stop it, attributing the "Final Solution" to subordinates like Himmler or Heydrich. Controversies and Falsification

While the book became a bestseller, particularly in Germany, it was met with fierce criticism from mainstream historians. The following points were central to the backlash:

Introduction

David Irving is a British author, historian, and Holocaust denier, known for his extensive research on World War II and Adolf Hitler. One of his most notable works is "Hitler's War" (German: "Hitlers Krieg"), a book that presents a revisionist account of World War II and Hitler's role in it. The book has been translated into multiple languages, including Spanish as "La Guerra de Hitler".

Background and Controversy

Irving's work has been met with significant criticism and controversy, particularly regarding his views on the Holocaust. His books have been accused of promoting Holocaust denial and anti-Semitic sentiments. Many historians and scholars have challenged his interpretations, citing inaccuracies, flawed methodology, and a lack of credible sources.

Content and Main Arguments

In "Hitler's War", Irving presents a narrative that deviates from the widely accepted historical account of World War II. He argues that Hitler was not directly involved in the planning and execution of the Holocaust, and that the atrocities committed during the war were the result of actions by lower-ranking officials and the SS. Irving also claims that Hitler was not aware of the full extent of the atrocities being committed.

Irving's work relies heavily on primary sources, including diaries, letters, and interviews with former Nazi officials. However, his critics argue that he selectively presents and interprets these sources to support his revisionist thesis.

Reception and Criticism

The publication of "Hitler's War" in 1977 sparked intense debate and criticism from the historical community. Many scholars and historians have rejected Irving's claims, citing overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The book has been widely criticized for its methodological flaws, lack of objectivity, and promotion of Holocaust denial.

Impact and Legacy

Despite the controversy surrounding his work, Irving's books have had a significant impact on Holocaust denial and anti-Semitic discourse. His ideas have been influential among some far-right and neo-Nazi groups, which have used his work to promote their ideologies.

Counterarguments and Refutations

Many scholars have written extensively in response to Irving's claims, providing counterarguments and refutations. For example, historians such as Martin Broszat, Hans-Ulrich Wehler, and Richard Evans have challenged Irving's interpretations, citing extensive archival research and eyewitness testimony.

Conclusion

In conclusion, David Irving's "Hitler's War" or "La Guerra de Hitler" presents a highly contested and revisionist account of World War II and the Holocaust. While Irving's work has been influential among some circles, it has been widely criticized by scholars and historians for its methodological flaws, lack of objectivity, and promotion of Holocaust denial.

David Irving's "Hitler's War" (Spanish title: La guerra de Hitler) is a highly controversial biographical work that attempts to describe World War II from the perspective of Adolf Hitler. Originally published in 1977, the book gained notoriety for Irving's argument that Hitler was unaware of the Holocaust and that the systematic extermination of Jews was orchestrated by subordinates like Himmler and Heydrich without his knowledge. Key Content and Themes

Perspectivism: The narrative is strictly limited to what Hitler himself allegedly knew or did at the time, ignoring events he was not directly involved in. La Guerra de Hitler (originalmente Hitler’s War ),

Historical Revisionism: Irving portrays Hitler as a rational leader primarily concerned with German prosperity who was forced into a "preventive war" against the Soviet Union.

Controversial Claims: The book is central to the debate over "Holocaust denial," specifically regarding Irving's claim that no written order exists from Hitler for the Final Solution. Historical and Legal Controversy

While initially praised by some for its extensive use of primary archival documents and diaries, the book's credibility was later legally and academically dismantled.

Libel Trial: In 2000, Irving lost a landmark libel case against historian Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books.

Judicial Ruling: The High Court of London ruled that Irving had "persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence" to suit his pro-Nazi and anti-Semitic ideological agenda.

Current Status: Following the trial, many mainstream publishers ceased distribution, and Irving’s reputation as a historian was effectively destroyed.

La Guerra de Hitler (Hitler’s War) is a controversial 1977 biographical work by David Irving that attempts to portray Adolf Hitler as a rational leader unaware of the Holocaust, often claiming a lack of direct written orders. Although recognized for archival research, the book has been widely discredited by historians for manipulating evidence, with a 2000 British High Court ruling defining Irving as an active Holocaust denier. Further details on the historical criticism of this work are available at Wikipedia.

I’m unable to provide or link to a PDF of David Irving’s Hitler’s War (Spanish edition La guerra de Hitler), as doing so would likely violate copyright law. However, I can offer the following context and guidance:

About the book:
Hitler’s War (1977) is a controversial work by the British author David Irving, who is widely condemned by mainstream historians for Holocaust denial and distortion of historical facts. In this book, Irving argues that Adolf Hitler was unaware of the systematic extermination of Jews — a claim rejected by virtually all reputable historians. The book was initially praised for its detailed military narrative but later discredited due to Irving’s misuse of sources and his ideological agenda.

Spanish edition:
La guerra de Hitler has been published in Spanish by several presses over the years. It is out of print from mainstream publishers but may appear in second-hand markets or file-sharing sites.

Legal and ethical note:

  • Copyright on the work is still active in most countries (Irving died in 2019, and his works remain protected).
  • Sharing or downloading unauthorized PDFs is illegal in many jurisdictions.
  • Academically, the book is cited mainly as an example of historical revisionism, not reliable scholarship.

Where to find it legally:

  • Second-hand copies via AbeBooks, eBay, or IberLibro (search for “Irving, La guerra de Hitler”).
  • Some major libraries may hold copies (e.g., National Library of Spain, university libraries).

If you need a summary or critical analysis of the book’s arguments, I’m happy to provide that instead.

David Irving's "Hitler's War" is widely discredited by historians for manipulating evidence to argue that Hitler was unaware of the Holocaust. The work is considered ideological propaganda, characterized by systemic historical distortion, rather than objective analysis. For a detailed overview of the trial, visit Wikipedia. Copyright on the work is still active in

Lying About Hitler: The Irving-Lipstadt Trial and Historical Truth

Overview of "La guerra de Hitler" First published in 1977, this book is David Irving's most famous and controversial work. It attempts to narrate World War II exclusively from the perspective of Adolf Hitler, using a technique Irving calls "cleaning the grime" from historical records to show events as Hitler supposedly saw them from behind his desk.

Approach: Irving utilized thousands of pages of primary documents, including unpublished diaries and private correspondence of high-ranking Nazi officials (such as Goebbels and Himmler), to reconstruct a day-by-day account of Hitler's decision-making.

The Spanish Edition: The edition you referred to, published by Planeta in 1988, is a translation of this extensive research. Main Themes and Arguments

Hitler’s Culpability: Irving’s central, most criticized claim is that Hitler did not order the extermination of the Jews and remained largely ignorant of the Holocaust until late 1943 or 1944. He argues that the genocide was carried out by subordinates like Himmler without Hitler's explicit command.

The "Weak Dictator": Contrary to the image of an all-powerful tyrant, Irving portrays Hitler as a relatively "weak" leader who was often manipulated by his staff and was more concerned with military strategy than domestic atrocities.

Preventative War: The book suggests that the 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa) was a "preventative strike" to stop a pending Soviet attack on Europe. Critical Reception and Legal Controversy

While initially praised by some for its depth of research, the book eventually led to Irving’s professional downfall:

2. The Central Controversy: The "Clean Hitler" Thesis

The book sparked an immediate firestorm because of its central argument, which challenged the established historical consensus.

  • The "Innocence" Thesis: Irving argued that Hitler did not want war with Britain and France in 1939; he claimed the war was forced upon Hitler by the Allies. He portrayed Hitler as a rational statesman trying to reclaim German territory, rather than a warmonger bent on world domination.
  • The Holocaust Denial: The most explosive claim in the original edition involved the Holocaust. Irving argued that there was no written order from Hitler authorizing the genocide of the Jews. He claimed that the "Final Solution" was orchestrated by Himmler and other underlings behind Hitler's back, and that Hitler was essentially unaware of the full scale of the atrocities until very late in the war.
  • The "Amoral" Portrayal: Irving did not portray Hitler as a monster; he portrayed him as a hard-working, charismatic, and increasingly frustrated military leader. This "humanization" was seen by critics as an attempt to rehabilitate the Nazi dictator’s image.

5. Why the Book Still Matters

Despite being discredited by mainstream historians, Hitler’s War remains a significant artifact.

  • Historiography: It serves as a primary example of Historical Revisionism. It shows how the manipulation of primary sources can twist the narrative of history.
  • The Research: Oddly enough, even Irving's worst critics admit he discovered some genuine historical gems (private diaries and documents) that legitimate historians now use, even if they reject his interpretation of them.

In summary: The story of Hitler's War is the story of a historian who tried to exonerate a dictator. It is a cautionary tale about how history is written, the danger of bias, and the line between historical revision and the distortion of truth.

David Irving's "Hitler's War" is a highly controversial, well-researched narrative of WWII told from Hitler’s perspective that is widely dismissed by historians for its historical negationism and manipulation of evidence. The work attempts to argue that Hitler was unaware of the Holocaust, a claim rejected by mainstream academics who label the book ideologically driven apologia. More information on this topic can be found on Wikipedia.

David Irving’s Hitler’s War La guerra de Hitler ) is a controversial 1977 work that attempted to chronicle WWII exclusively through the eyes of Adolf Hitler, relying on diaries and personal accounts. While initially praised for its archival focus, the book is widely rejected by historians for its flawed thesis that Hitler was unaware of the Holocaust, a conclusion deemed a distortion of evidence following the 2000 Irving v. Penguin Books and Lipstadt libel trial.

"David Irving - Hitler’s War / La Guerra de Hitler (Castellano)" is a Spanish translation of a 1977 work that presents World War II from Hitler's perspective, claiming he was unaware of the Holocaust and portraying him as a rational leader. Mainstream historians consider the book historical negationism, and it was legally deemed in the UK to deliberately misrepresent evidence to whitewash Hitler's reputation. You can read a Wikipedia overview of the book's background at Where to find it legally:

Why People Still Search for This PDF

The enduring interest in Irving’s work is a case study in historical revisionism’s appeal. For some researchers, the PDF represents a challenge to “orthodox” history. For others, it’s a darkly fascinating look at how a skilled writer can manipulate sources. However, the overwhelming consensus in the academic community—including Richard J. Evans, Ian Kershaw, and Christopher Browning—is that Hitler’s War is not history but propaganda.