The EUREQA dataset
In EUREQA, every question is constructed through an implicit reasoning chain. The chain is constructed by parsing DBPedia. Each layer comprises three components: an entity, a fact about the entity, and a relation between the entity
and its counterpart from the next layer. The layers stack up to create chains with different depths of reasoning. We verbalize reasoning chains into natural sentences and anonymize the entity of each layer to create the question.
Questions can be solved layer by layer and each layer is guaranteed a unique answer. EUREQA is not a knowledge game: we adopt a knowledge filtering process that ensures that most LLMs have sufficient world knowledge to answer our questions.
EUREQA comprises a total of 2,991 questions of different reasoning depths and difficulties. The entities encompass a broad spectrum of topics, effectively reducing any potential bias arising from specific entity categories.
These data are great for analyzing the reasoning processes of LLMs
PerformanceHere we present the accuracy of ChatGPT, Gemini-Pro and GPT-4 on the hard set of EUREQA across different depths d of reasoning (number of layers in the questions). We evaluate two prompt strategies: direct zero-shot prompt and ICL with two examples. In general, with the entities recursively substituted by the descriptions of reasoning chaining layers, and therefore eliminating surface-level semantic cues, these models generate more incorrect answers. When the reasoning depth increases from one to five on hard questions, there is a notable decline in performance for all models. This finding underscores the significant impact that semantic shortcuts have on the accuracy of responses, and it also indicates that GPT-4 is considerably more capable of identifying and taking advantage of these shortcuts.
| depth | d=1 | d=2 | d=3 | d=4 | d=5 | |||||
| direct | icl | direct | icl | direct | icl | direct | icl | direct | icl | |
| ChatGPT | 22.3 | 53.3 | 7.0 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 39.2 | 3.7 | 39.3 | 7.2 | 39.0 |
| Gemini-Pro | 45.0 | 49.3 | 29.5 | 23.5 | 27.3 | 28.6 | 25.7 | 24.3 | 17.2 | 21.5 |
| GPT-4 | 60.3 | 76.0 | 50.0 | 63.7 | 51.3 | 61.7 | 52.7 | 63.7 | 46.9 | 61.9 |
Here’s a helpful feature idea for gfxpeersnet (assuming it’s a community or platform for GFX designers, peer feedback, and resource sharing):
Would you like a mockup wireframe description or a database schema for this feature?
In the niche ecosystem of digital art, VFX, and motion graphics, finding high-quality assets often means looking beyond general marketplaces. GFXPeers.net
occupies a specific corner of this world, functioning primarily as a private torrent tracker dedicated to CG-related content. What is GFXPeers?
Often confused with other "GFX" or "CG" sites, GFXPeers is the sister site to the
blog and forums. While GFXDomain acts as an open DDL (direct download) blog where links are shared publicly, GFXPeers is the private, invitation-only tracker side of the operation. Content Focus:
It specializes in assets for professionals and hobbyists in the 3D and visual effects industry, including software, plugins, textures, tutorials, and stock footage. The "Sister" Relationship: You will often see the logo labeled as GFXDomainPeers
, emphasizing its connection to the larger GFXDomain community. Key Differences: GFXPeers vs. CGPeers
Users frequently compare GFXPeers to its larger contemporary, (linked to
GFXPeers is generally smaller, with approximately 64,000 users compared to CGPeers' 311,000+. Availability:
While both sites are notoriously difficult to join, GFXPeers sometimes has more frequent "open registration" windows than the more restrictive CGPeers.
Much of the content is mirrored across both sites, but GFXPeers can sometimes serve as a vital backup when larger trackers face downtime. Community and Access gfxpeersnet
Joining GFXPeers is not as simple as signing up for a standard website. Like most private trackers, it relies on a ratio system
, meaning users must upload data (seed) to maintain their right to download. Registration:
It is typically closed, requiring an invitation from an existing member or waiting for a rare open sign-up event. Safety and Trust:
Because it is a private community, it is generally considered "cleaner" than public torrent sites, though users still exercise caution as they would with any third-party software source. Final Verdict
For those in the VFX and motion design industry, GFXPeers.net is a "niche but essential" resource. While it doesn't boast the massive user base of CGPeers, its tight-knit community and focused content library make it a high-value destination for digital artists looking for specific, professional-grade tools. how to find open registration dates for these types of trackers?
GFXPeers (gfxpeers.net) was a niche private torrent tracker dedicated to digital art, 3D modeling, VFX, and motion graphics assets. Often linked to the GFXDomain community, it served as a secondary platform for creative professionals and hobbyists looking for software, tutorials, and assets like plugins and textures. Recent Status and Operational Issues As of April 2026, GFXPeers is largely considered inactive or defunct
. The site has faced significant challenges over the past several years, leading to a decline in its reputation: Frequent Downtime
: The tracker was known for going offline for extended periods, often citing an inability to cover server costs without user donations. Lack of Maintenance
: Users frequently reported a stagnant codebase, unpatched bugs, and a lack of moderation. Security Concerns
: Reports indicated that malware was occasionally uploaded to the site due to the absence of active staff to verify torrents. Membership and Community Perception Unlike its more prestigious counterpart,
, GFXPeers was relatively easy to join, frequently opening its registration to the public. However, this accessibility came at a cost; the community often viewed it as a "lower-tier" tracker because much of its content was reportedly mirrored or stolen from other platforms like CGPeers. Alternatives for Digital Artists Here’s a helpful feature idea for gfxpeersnet (assuming
With GFXPeers largely out of the picture, users typically look to the following alternatives for high-quality graphics assets: CGPeers / CGPersia
: Widely considered the "holy grail" for digital art assets, though it is much harder to join.
: A related open direct download (DDL) blog that provides links to various file hosters.
: A large, public multi-purpose tracker that contains significant sections for CG software and tutorials. stable private trackers
GFXPeers is an exclusive, invite-only private tracker dedicated to Computer Graphics (CG) and visual effects (VFX) assets. The "Deep Story" of GFXPeers
The Origins: It emerged as a niche sister-site or alternative to the more famous CGPeers. While the latter was often the primary hub, GFXPeers focused on building a tighter, more curated community for professionals and hobbyists in 3D modeling, animation, and motion design.
The Shadow Economy: The site operates on a "ratio" system. To download rare courses or assets, users must upload content or maintain a high "seed" time. This creates a digital ecosystem where high-quality professional knowledge—often costing thousands of dollars—is shared for free among "peers."
Invite-Only Culture: You cannot simply sign up. Entry requires an invitation from an existing member or waiting for brief "open registration" windows that are rarely announced publicly. This exclusivity keeps the site under the radar of major software companies and anti-piracy groups.
The "VFX Diaspora": Many users are professional artists from major studios. The site functions as a clandestine library for assets that are otherwise locked behind massive paywalls or corporate subscriptions, allowing individuals to learn high-end industry tools (like Houdini, Maya, or Octane Render) that they couldn't afford on their own. 💡 Key Points for Newcomers
Rules are Law: Breaking the ratio rules or "hitting and running" (downloading without seeding) results in a permanent ban.
Sister Sites: It is often discussed alongside sites like CGPeers and GFXDomain. Why it’s helpful:
Security: Most members use VPNs or Seedboxes to maintain anonymity due to the copyrighted nature of the professional assets hosted there.
If you're looking for something specific, I can help you with: How to maintain a high ratio on private trackers Finding legal alternatives for free CG assets The difference between GFXPeers and CGPeers
It looks like you're asking for a useful report or summary regarding gfxpeersnet (likely a misspelling or specific reference to GFXPeers or a related network).
Based on common online discussions, here is a concise, useful report covering what GFXPeers is, its purpose, risks, and legal/operational status.
To understand GFXPeersNet, you must understand the technology that powers it. Most implementations of GFXPeersNet rely on BitTorrent protocol or similar decentralized sharing mechanisms. Here is a step-by-step breakdown:
Indexing: The GFXPeersNet portal or website does not host files on its own servers. Instead, it indexes .torrent files or magnet links provided by community members.
Swarming: When a user downloads a file (e.g., a 50GB ZBrush tutorial pack), they simultaneously upload fragments of that file to other users. This "swarm" behavior ensures that files remain available even if the original seeder goes offline.
Ratio Culture: Many private trackers associated with GFXPeersNet enforce a "ratio system." Users must upload as much as they download. This quality control mechanism weeds out "leechers" (users who only take) and rewards "seeders" (users who share).
This is the biggest practical danger. “Cracked” software is a favorite hiding place for:
Even with user comments, malware can slip through. You’re trusting anonymous uploaders with administrator access to your machine.
This website is adapted from Nerfies, UniversalNER and LLaVA, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. We thank the LLaMA team for giving us access to their models.
Usage and License Notices: The data abd code is intended and licensed for research use only. They are also restricted to uses that follow the license agreement of LLaMA, ChatGPT, and the original dataset used in the benchmark. The dataset is CC BY NC 4.0 (allowing only non-commercial use) and models trained using the dataset should not be used outside of research purposes.