(1981) is one of Larry Rivers' most controversial works, moving beyond his traditional canvas into the medium of film and video. While often categorized alongside his late 20th-century experimentation, the piece has sparked significant ethical debate regarding art, privacy, and the exploitation of family members. Overview of the Work
Medium & Format: Unlike his famous "Pop Art" paintings, Growing was a series of films and videotapes edited into a final project in the early 1980s.
Subject Matter: The project documented the physical maturation of his two daughters, Gwynne and Emma Tamburlini, over a five-year period from 1976 to 1981.
Content: Rivers filmed his daughters at six-month intervals, often focusing on their developing bodies and asking them intimate, probing questions about puberty and sexuality. Artistic and Ethical Controversy
The piece was originally intended to be displayed in a continuous loop alongside his paintings. However, it remained largely unseen for decades due to its highly sensitive nature:
Lack of Consent: In recent years, his daughter Emma Tamburlini has publicly stated she felt extremely uncomfortable and did not consent to the filming.
Public Fallout: When the Larry Rivers Foundation attempted to donate his archives to New York University in 2010, the inclusion of Growing caused a "firestorm" of criticism. NYU eventually returned the tapes to the foundation to avoid legal and ethical complications.
Critical Reception: The work is often used as a case study for the "line between nudity and pornography" and the ethics of using family members as artistic subjects. Relation to Rivers' Broader Style
While Growing is a video work, it reflects Rivers' lifelong obsession with the human figure and "unfashionable" subjects. His style—often described by The Art Story as a bridge between Abstract Expressionism and Pop Art—frequently used "iconographic clichés" and personal imagery to challenge established norms.
Larry Rivers, Growing (1981)
Oil and charcoal on canvas, approx. 72 x 80 in.
By the time Larry Rivers painted Growing in 1981, he had long since proven himself a chameleon of postwar American art. A former saxophonist turned painter, Rivers helped pioneer Pop Art before Pop officially existed, yet he never abandoned the gestural bravado of Abstract Expressionism. Growing—a late, confident work—finds him synthesizing these impulses into a rich, ambivalent meditation on organic life, mortality, and the very act of painting.
Subject and Composition
At first glance, Growing appears to depict a humble domestic or botanical scene: a sprawling potted plant, perhaps a philodendron or monstera, unfurling across a tabletop. But Rivers was never a pure realist. The plant’s leaves are rendered with quick, slashing charcoal outlines, some partially filled with muted greens, others left as ghostly sketches. The background is a field of dirty cream, gray, and pale pink—washes that suggest a wall and table, but refuse to settle into stable depth.
The title is ironic and earnest in equal measure. Growing captures a moment of arrested expansion: tendrils reach outward, leaves overlap, yet the entire scene feels suspended between vigorous life and decay. A few lower leaves are daubed with brownish-yellow, as if spotted with age or disease. Rivers seems less interested in botanical accuracy than in using the plant as a metaphor for the artist’s own late-career productivity—persistent, messy, still reaching.
Technique and Touch
What elevates Growing above a casual still life is Rivers’ handling of paint. He applies oil in thin, translucent layers alongside thick, almost sculptural impasto. Charcoal lines dance between representation and abstraction: some describe leaf veins with precise tenderness; others slash across the canvas, threatening to tear the image apart.
This is Rivers at his most fluent. The influence of Willem de Kooning and the New York School is unmistakable—the push-and-pull of figure and ground, the aggressive yet lyrical mark-making. Yet Rivers adds a Pop-era coolness: the plant is treated almost like a commercial illustration that has been deliberately roughened and rethought. The tension between graphic clarity and painterly chaos gives Growing its unsettled, compelling energy.
Interpretation and Context
Painted just three years before his death, Growing feels like a quiet manifesto. Rivers had survived the wild 1960s and 70s—his landmark The Last Civil War Veteran (1959), his famous Parts of the Body series, his collaborations with poets Frank O’Hara and Kenneth Koch. By 1981, the art world had moved on to Neo-Expressionism and Pictures Generation conceptualism. Rivers, ever the outsider-insider, ignored trends.
Growing is not nostalgic. Instead, it faces time head-on. The plant’s unruly spread evokes creativity that refuses to be pruned, even as it shows signs of wear. There is also an autobiographical thread: Rivers was a famously persistent womanizer, bon vivant, and father. Growing can be read as a self-portrait of appetite—for life, for art, for physical pleasure—tempered by the knowledge that all growth contains its own end.
Flaws and Limitations
No Rivers review is complete without noting his occasional slickness. At times, Growing seems too comfortable, too knowing. The “messy” passages can feel calculated, unlike the raw struggle of de Kooning’s Excavation or the deadpan mystery of Rivers’ own earlier Washington Crossing the Delaware. Some critics might argue that the plant-as-metaphor is too easy, a bit of midcentury poetic thinking that by 1981 had grown tired.
Still, these reservations fade when you stand before the actual canvas. The scale—roughly six by seven feet—forces you into the plant’s space. You feel the weight of each brushstroke, the hesitation and confidence alternating.
Conclusion
Growing (1981) is not Larry Rivers’ most famous painting, nor his most radical. But it may be one of his most honest. It offers no grand narrative, no pop-culture provocation—just a man in his late fifties watching a plant spread across a table, recognizing in its unruly, imperfect reach his own stubborn commitment to making art.
For fans of Rivers, it is an essential late statement. For newcomers, it serves as a perfect entry point: all his contradictions—realist and abstract, tender and aggressive, cerebral and sensual—are on display. Growing reminds us that Larry Rivers, even when painting something as simple as a houseplant, was never simply painting a thing. He was painting time, desire, and the wild, untidy process of becoming.
Rating: ★★★★☆ (Highly recommended)
The work titled Growing" (1981) is a highly controversial documentary series created by American artist Larry Rivers
. This project has become a central point of debate regarding the boundaries between art, privacy, and exploitation. Overview of the Series 1976 and 1981 , Rivers filmed his two adolescent daughters, Emma Tamburlini Gwynne Rivers , at six-month intervals. growing 1981 larry rivers
The series documents the girls' physical development through puberty. According to reports from The New York Times Vanity Fair
, the footage often shows them topless or naked while Rivers asks them questions about their changing bodies and sexuality. Intent vs. Reality:
Rivers originally intended for the film to be played in a continuous loop during a 1981 exhibition of his paintings. However, he was dissuaded by the girls' mother, Clarice Rivers , and the footage remained unexhibited during his lifetime. The Modern Controversy The series resurfaced in 2010 when New York University (NYU) was in the process of purchasing Rivers' archive from the Larry Rivers Foundation Daughters' Stance:
Emma Tamburlini has publicly condemned the work, describing it as "nothing less than child pornography" and stating that the experience caused her long-term emotional distress and contributed to an eating disorder. NYU's Response:
After the content of the tapes became public, NYU announced it did not want the footage
as part of its archive and returned the materials to the Foundation. Current Status:
The daughters have spent years seeking the return of the footage to ensure it is never made public, while the Foundation initially sought to keep the materials restricted during the daughters' lifetimes rather than destroying them.
Critics and art historians often cite "Growing" as a significant example of Rivers' "taboo-busting" style overstepping ethical lines. How would you like to frame the discussion around this specific piece for your post? N.Y.U. Doesn't Want Film of Larry Rivers's Naked Daughters
(1981) is a controversial and largely suppressed video work by the American artist Larry Rivers
. Originally intended for a 1981 exhibition, the work features footage of Rivers’ two young daughters, Emma and Gwynne, as they grew up. History and Controversy
The work has been the subject of significant ethical debate regarding the boundaries between art and the privacy of its subjects. Although created decades ago, it remained largely unseen for many years following concerns raised by the girls' mother. Archive and Privacy Rights
The project returned to public discourse in 2010 when New York University (NYU) acquired the artist's personal archives. This led to a public discussion regarding the rights of the individuals depicted in the footage versus the preservation of an artist's body of work: Request for Removal
: The daughters formally requested that the materials be removed from the public archive to protect their privacy. Resolution
: Following a period of public attention and institutional review, NYU eventually returned the specific tapes to the Larry Rivers Foundation. Current Status (1981) is one of Larry Rivers' most controversial
: The Foundation has maintained a policy that the work will not be exhibited publicly, respecting the privacy and wishes of the family members involved.
Information is available regarding Larry Rivers' broader impact on the Pop Art movement or his notable collaborations with members of the New York School of poets if that is of interest. The Crimes Against Thérèse Blanchard - Carolyn Gage
Larry Rivers was a pivotal figure in American art, often described by contemporaries like Andy Warhol as the bridge between Abstract Expressionism and Pop Art. While he is celebrated for his "unique personality" and draftsmanship, the specific keyword "Growing 1981" refers to one of the most controversial chapters of his career: a documentary film project titled Growing, completed in 1981, which remains a focal point of intense ethical debate. The Context of Growing (1976–1981)
Growing was a multi-year documentary project where Rivers filmed his two daughters, Gwynne and Emma, at six-month intervals starting when they were roughly 11 years old. The footage, spanning from 1976 to 1981, recorded their physical development during puberty.
Rivers intended the 45-minute film to be an artistic exploration of human growth and a challenge to social taboos regarding the body. However, the methods he used—which included filming his daughters topless or naked and questioning them about their changing bodies—have been condemned by his children and critics alike. The 1981 Turning Point
In 1981, Rivers edited the five years of footage into a final version intended for public exhibition. This release was blocked by the girls' mother, Clarice Rivers, and the film was subsequently withheld from the public eye for decades.
The controversy resurfaced in 2010 when New York University (NYU) attempted to acquire the Larry Rivers Foundation archive. Upon learning of the film's contents and the lack of consent from the subjects, NYU returned the tapes to the Foundation. Emma Rivers Tamburlini has since characterized the work as child pornography and "a document of exploitation and abuse," leading to a movement to have the original tapes destroyed or permanently suppressed. Art Style and Wider Influence in 1981
Beyond the Growing controversy, 1981 was a significant year for Rivers' established career:
Larry Rivers was a prominent American artist known for his work in various mediums, including painting, sculpture, and printmaking. Born in 1923, Rivers gained fame for his unique style that blended elements of Abstract Expressionism and Pop Art.
In 1981, Rivers was 58 years old and already an established figure in the art world. During this period, he continued to experiment with new techniques and themes, further solidifying his reputation as a versatile and innovative artist.
Some notable features of Larry Rivers' work in 1981 include:
Some notable works from Larry Rivers' 1981 include:
Overall, 1981 was a significant year for Larry Rivers, marked by continued innovation and experimentation in his art. His work from this period reflects his ongoing engagement with themes of culture, history, and identity, as well as his commitment to pushing the boundaries of traditional art forms.
Growing cannabis involves attention to detail, a good understanding of the plant's needs, and a bit of patience. If you're specifically interested in the "1981 Larry Rivers" strain, try to find more information from specialized cannabis seed banks or collectors who focus on vintage strains. Good luck with your grow! A Review of Larry Rivers’ Growing (1981) Larry