Two Kinds Of Knowledge Ew Kenyon Pdf Best 🚀

The Divide Between the Natural and the Spiritual: An Analysis of E.W. Kenyon’s Two Kinds of Knowledge

In the landscape of modern Christian thought, few works have sparked as much debate and transformation as E.W. Kenyon’s Two Kinds of Knowledge. Kenyon, often cited as the father of the modern "Word of Faith" movement, presents a theological thesis that is deceptively simple yet radical in its implications: that the knowledge gained through the five senses is fundamentally different from the knowledge gained through the Spirit of God. By delineating between Sense Knowledge and Revelation Knowledge, Kenyon argues that the crisis of the modern church stems from its reliance on human reason at the expense of divine truth.

Kenyon begins his treatise by establishing the limitations of what he terms "Sense Knowledge." This is the epistemology of the natural world—the realm of science, philosophy, and human intellect. Sense Knowledge is derived strictly from observation and experimentation; it is the domain of "seeing is believing." Kenyon does not dismiss the value of this knowledge entirely, acknowledging that it has brought about advancements in medicine, technology, and civilization. However, he asserts that it is utterly incapable of comprehending the spiritual realm. Just as a microscope cannot measure love or a scale cannot weigh justice, the human mind cannot reason its way to God. Sense Knowledge creates a barrier to faith because it demands evidence before it believes, a stance that contradicts the biblical definition of faith as "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."

In stark contrast to the sensory-based intellect, Kenyon introduces "Revelation Knowledge." This is not knowledge discovered by human effort, but knowledge revealed by the Holy Spirit. Kenyon posits that the Bible is not merely a historical record or a literary masterpiece to be analyzed with literary criticism; rather, it is a living document authored by God. When a believer approaches Scripture with their spirit rather than their intellect, the Holy Spirit imparts "Revelation Knowledge." This type of knowledge bypasses the skepticism of the mind and takes root in the human spirit. For Kenyon, this is the key to the "Zoe" life—the absolute life of God. It is through this revelation that a believer understands their identity in Christ, the reality of the new birth, and the legal rights of the believer.

The central tension of the essay—and indeed, of Kenyon’s broader theology—lies in the conflict between these two types of knowledge. He argues that much of modern theology and religious skepticism is the result of attempting to interpret spiritual realities through the lens of Sense Knowledge. When theologians apply rationalistic criticism to the Bible, they strip it of its power, turning the Word of God into mere history. Kenyon argues that this reliance on the "Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil" (human reasoning) caused the Fall, and the church’s continued reliance on it prevents it from walking in the power of the Spirit. He posits that the intellect is often the enemy of faith, as it limits God to the boundaries of what is naturally possible.

Ultimately, the thesis of Two Kinds of Knowledge serves as a call to spiritual action. Kenyon urges the believer to "walk in the spirit," a state where the mind is renewed by the Word rather than the world. The "best" of this text is found in its empowering conclusion: that spiritual truths are not abstract concepts to be debated in seminaries, but tangible realities to be lived. By shifting one’s dependency from the unreliability of the senses to the certainty of God’s written Word, the believer can unlock a life of victory that remains inaccessible to human wisdom alone. In this way, Kenyon’s work challenges the reader to choose their source of knowledge, for the quality of one’s life is determined by the quality of the knowledge by which they live.

The Two Kinds of Knowledge: A Detailed Analysis of E.W. Kenyon's Perspective

E.W. Kenyon, a renowned American preacher and writer, extensively explored the concept of knowledge in his literary works, particularly in his book "The Wonderful Name of Jesus" and other related writings. According to Kenyon, there are two distinct kinds of knowledge: spiritual knowledge and natural knowledge. This essay aims to provide an in-depth analysis of these two kinds of knowledge, their characteristics, and implications, as presented in Kenyon's works, including "The Two Kinds of Knowledge" (available in PDF format).

Introduction to the Two Kinds of Knowledge

In his writings, Kenyon argues that there are two fundamental types of knowledge: knowledge of the natural realm and knowledge of the spiritual realm. He contends that these two kinds of knowledge are distinct, separate, and often not related. The natural knowledge is acquired through our senses, intellect, and reasoning, whereas spiritual knowledge is received through faith, intuition, and divine revelation.

Natural Knowledge

Natural knowledge, according to Kenyon, is the knowledge that we acquire through our senses, observation, and reasoning. This type of knowledge is empirical, tangible, and verifiable. It is the knowledge that we gain through science, history, and our everyday experiences. Natural knowledge is limited to the realm of the physical world and is subject to the laws of nature. It is often fragmented, incomplete, and imperfect.

Kenyon asserts that natural knowledge is not sufficient for spiritual growth and development. He argues that many people rely solely on their natural knowledge, which leads to a life of uncertainty, fear, and frustration. Natural knowledge can provide us with facts and information, but it cannot give us the assurance and confidence that come from spiritual knowledge.

Spiritual Knowledge

Spiritual knowledge, on the other hand, is the knowledge that we receive through faith, intuition, and divine revelation. This type of knowledge is not empirical or tangible but is rather a direct experience of the divine. Spiritual knowledge is not limited to the realm of the physical world but extends into the realm of the spirit. It is often complete, absolute, and eternal.

According to Kenyon, spiritual knowledge is the knowledge of God's thoughts, plans, and purposes. It is the knowledge that comes from the Spirit of God, who reveals to us the deep things of God. Spiritual knowledge is not something that we can acquire through our own efforts or intellect; rather, it is something that is imparted to us by the Holy Spirit.

Characteristics of Spiritual Knowledge

Kenyon highlights several characteristics of spiritual knowledge:

1. Absolute certainty: Spiritual knowledge is absolute and certain, unlike natural knowledge, which is often uncertain and relative.
2. Eternal validity: Spiritual knowledge is eternal and unchanging, whereas natural knowledge is subject to change and revision.
3. Inner conviction: Spiritual knowledge produces an inner conviction and assurance that cannot be shaken by external circumstances.
4. Divine origin: Spiritual knowledge comes from God, and its source is the Holy Spirit.

Implications of the Two Kinds of Knowledge

The distinction between natural knowledge and spiritual knowledge has significant implications for our lives. Kenyon argues that many people live their lives based on natural knowledge alone, which leads to a life of fear, anxiety, and uncertainty. In contrast, those who live by spiritual knowledge experience a life of faith, confidence, and victory.

Spiritual knowledge gives us insight into God's plans and purposes for our lives. It enables us to understand our position in Christ and to live a life of authority and dominion. Spiritual knowledge also gives us the ability to discern the thoughts and intents of the heart, to understand the spiritual realm, and to walk in the supernatural. two kinds of knowledge ew kenyon pdf best

Conclusion

In conclusion, E.W. Kenyon's concept of the two kinds of knowledge highlights the distinction between natural knowledge and spiritual knowledge. While natural knowledge is acquired through our senses and intellect, spiritual knowledge is received through faith and divine revelation. Spiritual knowledge is absolute, eternal, and certain, and it produces an inner conviction and assurance that cannot be shaken by external circumstances.

As we live in a world that often emphasizes natural knowledge and empirical evidence, Kenyon's writings remind us of the importance of seeking spiritual knowledge. By embracing spiritual knowledge, we can experience a life of faith, confidence, and victory, and we can walk in the supernatural, empowered by the Holy Spirit.

References

• Kenyon, E.W. (n.d.). The Wonderful Name of Jesus. New York: Pyramid Publishing.
• Kenyon, E.W. (n.d.). The Two Kinds of Knowledge. PDF available online.

This essay provides a detailed analysis of E.W. Kenyon's perspective on the two kinds of knowledge. It highlights the characteristics and implications of natural knowledge and spiritual knowledge, and it emphasizes the importance of seeking spiritual knowledge in our lives.

In his seminal work, The Two Kinds of Knowledge E.W. Kenyon distinguishes between Sense Knowledge (information gained through the physical body) and Revelation Knowledge (truth received from God’s Word). He argues that while human intellect is powerful in the material world, it is fundamentally incapable of perceiving spiritual realities or the nature of God. 1. Sense Knowledge (The Human Realm)